A12XBionic 79 Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 12% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2500 MHz) Pros of Apple A12X Bionic Performs 79% better in floating-point computations Shows significantly better (up to 54%) AnTuTu 9 score - 633K vs 411K Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)

Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3
Inthis comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is 11% better than A12 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A12 Bionic has 2 more core than Snapdragon 845 SDM845.Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption. VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Adreno 630 with the older 6-core Apple A11 Bionic Apple GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more cores17% higher CPU clock speed 2800 vs 2390 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Apple A11 Bionic Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth against GB/s Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 102331 126597 GPU 154456 122199 Memory 57724 65581 UX 87647 84287 Total score 405551 399113 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s 21 images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 81% 62% Graphics test 8 FPS 18 FPS Score 1438 3146 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 53 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 55 FPS [High] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 48 FPS [High] - World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 56 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Pocophone F1 1080 x 2246 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 845 and A11 Bionic CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Kryo 385 Gold Cortex-A754x GHz – Kryo 385 Silver Cortex-A55 2x GHz – Monsoon4x GHz – Mistral Cores 8 6 Frequency 2800 MHz 2390 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 128 KB 64 KB L2 cache 256 KB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 10 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 9 W 8 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 630 Apple GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 710 MHz - Execution units 2 3 Shading units 256 - FLOPS 727 Gigaflops 325 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 Apple M10 Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2436 x 1125 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X20 - 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 845 833 Total votes 1530 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A11 Bionic and Snapdragon 845, or ask any questions
Also A12 Bionic is more power efficient and consumes less power. Unlike the 6-core CPU implementation of the A12, the Snapdragon 855 has 8-core configuration. Qualcomm has opted for a tri-cluster
Apple A14 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 845Why is Apple A14 Bionic better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 845?5nm smaller semiconductor size?5nmvs10nm1090MHz faster GPU clock speed?1800MHzvs710MHzHas 5G support?2290MHz faster GPU turbo speed?3000MHzvs710MHz3W lower TDP? bigger L2 cache? higher single-core Geekbench 5 result? higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?4112vs2197Why is Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 better than Apple A14 Bionic? faster CPU speed?4 x & 4 x x & 4 x more CPU threads?8vs62 more memory channels? newer version of OpenGL ES? bigger L1 cache?256KBvs192KBUser reviewsOverall ratingApple A14 Bionic3 User reviewsApple A14 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 84511 User reviewsQualcomm Snapdragon 845FeaturesGeneral infoA 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its graphics processing unit GPU has a higher clock is used in games, with newer versions supporting better fifth-generation wireless technology delivers higher speeds and lower latency than the previous, fourth-generation the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicSome apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit GPU for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores processing units. It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of threads result in faster performance and better technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery Multi-Processing HMP is a more advanced version of technology. In this setup, a processor can utilize all cores at the same time, or just a single core for low-intensity tasks. This can provide powerful performance or increased battery life clock speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide multiplier Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845The clock multiplier controls the speed of the cache Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicA larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicIt can support faster memory, which will give quicker system Double Data Rate memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more maximum amount of memory RAM is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicA higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a system on a chip SoC has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicThe download speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can access online speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicThe upload speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can send information to a server or another technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management DRM.Multithreading technology such as Intel's Hyperthreading or AMD's Simultaneous Multithreading provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor's physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at bit helps protect the computer from malicious provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to is used to speed up encryption and version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 BionicVector Floating-Point VFP is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's single-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023PassMark result Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple result single Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single result overclocked Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Apple A14 Bionic Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU when it is Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Show allThis page is currently only available in English.

Dibagian depan daya, Snapdragon 845 lebih hemat daya, berkat proses desain 10nm dan unit pemrosesan khusus. Selain itu, ia juga dapat mengisi daya lebih cepat, berkat dukungannya untuk Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+. Berbeda dengan CPU delapan-inti, A12 Bionic memiliki CPU enam-inti dengan dua core kinerja dan empat core efisiensi.

Over the last few years, Apple has managed to set new records with its custom-designed A-series chips used in its iPhones and iPads. With the iPhone XS and iPhone XR this year, the company unveiled its 7nm A12 Bionic chip where it claimed a modest 15 percent performance improvement over the A11 Bionic from last year. Given that Apple has always managed to introduce performance jumps of anywhere between 20-40 percent with its new chipsets, a 15 percent jump in CPU performance seemed modest. Well, turns out, Apple’s marketing team was extremely conservative in their claims. AnandTech is out with its detailed review of the iPhone XS and they provide a fantastic insight into the A12 Bionic chip. Firstly, it is interesting to see that despite the A12 Bionic packing a staggering billion transistors compared to 4 billion on the A11 Bionic, the former actually has a smaller die size — vs This is because of Apple making the switch to TSMC’s new 7nm fabrication process which has improved the overall transistor density. In terms of frequencies, the two big Vortex’ cores inside the A12 Bionic run at compared to on the A11 Bionic. However, only one big CPU core is able to reach this frequency, with the overall frequency dropping as more chips are required to run at full power. As for the four smaller Tempest’ cores, they continue to run at the same speed as on the A11 Bionic Apple has made some huge changes to the memory subsystem of its A12 Bionic which allows the big CPU cores to complete operations in considerably fewer number of cycles thereby bringing a major performance improvement. The Vortex cores have only a 5% boost in frequency over the Monsoon cores, yet the absolute L2 memory latency has improved by 29% from ~ down to ~ Meaning the new Vortex cores’ L2 cache now completes its operations in a significantly fewer number of cycles. In terms of power efficiency, the A12 Bionic consumes 12 percent less power than the A11 Bionic at its peak performance in certain benchmarks. Overall though, the revamped memory subsystem consumes a lot of power when pushed hard which pushes the overall power consumption of the platform. In the benchmarks where the performance gains were the largest – the aforementioned memory limited workloads – we saw power consumption rise quite significantly. So even though 7nm promised power gains, Apple’s opted to spend more energy than what the new process node has saved, so average power across the totality of SPECint2006 did go up from ~ on the A11 to on the A12. Apple simply has no competitor in the mobile chipset department, with Qualcomm and Samsung offerings being considerably slower. Overall the new A12 Vortex cores and the architectural improvements on the SoC’s memory subsystem give Apple’s new piece of silicon a much higher performance advantage than Apple’s marketing materials promote. The contrast to the best Android SoCs have to offer is extremely stark – both in terms of performance as well as in power efficiency. Apple’s SoCs have better energy efficiency than all recent Android SoCs while having a nearly 2x performance advantage. I wouldn’t be surprised that if we were to normalise for energy used, Apple would have a 3x performance efficiency lead. For the GPU, when Apple claimed the 4-core GPU offered a 50 percent performance improvement, many thought the company had designed its own GPU from scratch. However, as per AnandTech, the GPU inside A12 — G11P — is very similar to that of the GPU found inside the A11. Apple has made huge performance improvements by adding memory compression, a surprising omission from its GPUs of the past. The addition of memory compression along with an additional GPU core lead to the new 4-core GPU inside the A12 Bionic outperforming every other mobile GPU out there. This includes Qualcomm’s Adreno 630 GPU found inside on the Snapdragon 845 chipset which powers flagship Android devices like the OnePlus 6, LG G7, and more. In some cases, the performance improvement when compared to the iPhone X is well over 75 percent! The improvements here are not just because of the microarchitectural improvements of the GPU, and having an extra core, all along with the new process node of the SoC, but also thanks to the new memory compression which will reduce power consumption of the external DRAM, something that can represent up to 20-30% of system power in bandwidth heavy 3D workloads. Saved power on the DRAM means more thermal envelope that can be used by the GPU and SoC, increasing performance. Our Take Given the way Apple has been pushing the performance bar with its mobile chipsets over the last few years, it looks like the day is not far away when we will see the company unveil a MacBook powered by its own A-series chip instead of one from Intel. The whole review of the iPhone XS from AnandTech makes for an interesting read so make sure to hit the source link below. [Via AnandTech] A13Bionic 82 Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Has 2 more cores 5% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2660 MHz) Pros of Apple A13 Bionic Shows significantly better (up to 50%) AnTuTu 9 score - 616K vs 410K Announced 1-year and 9-months later Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)

No início de julho deste ano a Qualcomm apresentou durante a Computex 2018 o novo processador da marca, o Snapdragon 850. Dedicado aos Always Connected PCs, o chipset conta com litografia de 10 nanômetros da segunda geração mesmo utilizado no Snapdragon 845, chega com conectividade LTE de 1,2 Gigabits graças ao modem Snapdragon X20 LTE além de melhorias de Inteligência Artificial e tendo GPU Adreno 630. Mas com a chegada do novo processador da Apple para os iPhone XR, XS e XS Max, o A12 Bionic se mostrou extremamente poderoso e surpreendente. E agora um novo resultado de benchmark mostra que o notebook Lenovo 81JL com Snapdragon 850 perde para o chip da Apple para smartphones! Economia e mercado 15 Out Apple 12 Set Como você pode conferir nas imagens, enquanto o A12 Bionic marca pontos no teste single-core e no teste multicore, o Snapdrapon 850 atinge pontos no single-core e pontos no multi-core. É importante lembrar que a comparação é relativamente injusta, convenhamos. Enquanto o chipset da Qualcomm conta com litografia de 10 nm, o da Apple conta com 7 nm que é muito mais superior, rápido e econômico que o da concorrente. Entretanto, é possível que isso mude com a chegada do Snapdragon 8180, sucessor do 850 e que deverá chegar já com a nova litografia de 7 nm e, ainda mais impressionante TDP de 15 watt, comparável aos processadores da NVIDIA e como o Snapdragon 8180 chipset voltado para notebooks Always Connected, a Qualcomm deverá anunciar em dezembro o Snapdragon 8150, sucessor do Snapdragon 845 que também deverá ser anunciado com litografia de 7 nanômetros. Então espere para comparações mais curiosas e interessantes nos próximos meses!

Answer(1 of 4): First you need to understand what is important in mobile CPU. You may notice that there are 8-core, 10-core CPUs that have massive benchmark results. Well, what really matters is single-core power in majority of apps for regular use and then you need dual-core power, maximum quad
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845, compare of GPUs Apple A12 Bionic and Adreno 630. This performance comparison includes two processors A12 Bionic is gexa-core Vortex and Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is octa-core Kryo 385. Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Geekbench 5, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy A12 Bionic or Snapdragon 845 SDM845 and which chip is better for gaming Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2. Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processorsCPU BenchmarkBased on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA12 Bionic30% Snapdragon 845 SDM84520%Battery life testPower Consumption efficiency how quickly the processor reduces the battery chargeA12 Bionic72% Snapdragon 845 SDM84563%Gaming performanceWhich CPU is better for gamingA12 Bionic29% Snapdragon 845 SDM84519%Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speedA12 Bionic Snapdragon 845 SDM845Total score419987280088CPU11759378415GPU159589106425MEM6718844812UX7559150418GeekBench benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performanceA12 Bionic Snapdragon 845 SDM845Single-Core900616Multi-Core29702218Comparison of specificationsCPU and MemoryA12 Bionic Snapdragon 845 SDM845Frequency2490 MHz2800 MHzCores68Bit6464Lithography7 nm10 nmTransistors count6900 millionsCore GHz GHz Kryo 385Power consumption TDP6 W9 WMemory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4x Dual ChannelMax. Memory12 Gb8 GbMemory Frequency21331866Memory Processor NPUYesYesL1 cache128 KB256 KBL2 cache8 MB1 MBL3 cache2 MBInstruction set architecture ISA this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is 11% better than A12 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A12 Bionic has 2 more core than Snapdragon 845 SDM845. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power and MediaGPUApple A12 BionicAdreno 630GPU Frequency2500 MHz650 MHzGFloPS586712 of Cores4 of Shader Units512Display2688 x 1242 pixels2560 x 1600 pixelsThe frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it benchmarkFortnite Battlegrounds PUBG Mobile Free Fire - The of Duty Theft Auto V GTA 5 Mobile Pocket Racing for Speed No Kombat Racing numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings Ultra, Medium, Normal, the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench resolution12 MP32 MPDual Camera resolution12 MP16 MPImage Signal Processor ISPApple ISPQualcomm Spectra 280Video Encoding FPS96060Video Encoding resolution4K Ultra HD, 2K, FullHD4K Ultra HD, 2K, FullHDCodec supportDolby Vision, HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AVC, VP8, and NavigationModemIntel XMM 7560 LTEQualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modemDownload speed1000 MBit/ MBit/ speed350 MBit/ MBit/ GLONASS, Beidou, GPSGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBASNFC supportYesNo5G supportYesNoResult The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic is better 24 The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 is better 20 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 845 SDM845, as well as read the test results at the links Bionic SoC Comparisons• Vs Snapdragon 875• Vs Snapdragon 750G• Vs A13 Bionic• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865• Vs Apple A14 Bionic• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L• Vs Samsung Exynos 990• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus• Vs Apple A12X Bionic• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G• Vs MediaTek Helio G95• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G• Vs MediaTek Helio G90• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520• Vs Samsung Exynos 980• Vs MediaTek Helio G85• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810• Vs MediaTek Helio G80• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus• Vs MediaTek Helio G88• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828• Vs MediaTek Helio G99• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1• Vs Apple A16 Bionic• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra• Vs Apple M2• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380• Vs Apple A17 Bionic• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020Snapdragon 845 SDM845 SoC Comparisons• Vs Snapdragon 750G• Vs Helio P65 MT6768• Vs A13 Bionic• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865• Vs Apple A14 Bionic• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L• Vs Samsung Exynos 990• Vs MediaTek Helio G90• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G• Vs MediaTek Helio G95• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520• Vs Samsung Exynos 980• Vs MediaTek Helio G85• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810• Vs MediaTek Helio G80• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712• Vs Samsung Exynos 880• Vs MediaTek Helio G70• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675• Vs MediaTek Helio P95• Vs MediaTek Helio P90• Vs MediaTek Helio P60• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3• Vs MediaTek Helio G88• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500• Vs MediaTek Helio G99• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
AppleA12 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps. 2. Has integrated graphics Apple A12 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 With integrated graphics you don't need to buy a separate graphics card.
VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments 6 Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs 61% better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more cores14% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2490 MHz Pros of Apple A12 Bionic Higher GPU frequency ~92%Better instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 141555 127267 GPU 184296 196436 Memory 62560 99161 UX 131223 104297 Total score 522806 531765 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 21 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning 48 images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s 745 Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 69% Graphics test 18 FPS 31 FPS Score 3096 5218 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 56 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 57 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A12 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz Instruction set L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A12 Bionic GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 585 MHz 1125 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 899 Gigaflops 560 Gigaflops Vulkan version - OpenCL version - DirectX version 12 - Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Neural Engine Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3 Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Intel XMM 7560 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 1244 Total votes 2665 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions Ronaldo SUUIII 24 November 2022 2318 Why does the iphone 8 plus perform better than the iphone X and iphone 8? +52 Reply RuTH 02 September 2022 0316 I have an iPad mini 5 and Sharp Aquos R3, which are all good. Play games using iPad mini 5, play Apex or use a social apps use Sharp Aquos R3 because have 120hz. +8 Reply Nobody 01 December 2021 1137 The funny thing is this lowly Sharp Aquos R3 has SD855 with a price tag of around $130 but for Ipad Mini 5 around 5 times more expensive XD +28 Reply Ur 15 November 2021 1522 Keep in mind the SD 855 is much cheaper +21 Reply Namdi 15 October 2021 1141 Well experience justified more. Apple always has better performance and optimisation. Android scale to run short however android Snapdragon turns to be in equilibrium with apple but upto some extent. Don't mind but apple always ahead +11 Reply chris Do 28 July 2021 2047 Their performance nearly the same but apple always have better optimization so i’ll go for a12 +33 Reply Do chris 30 September 2021 0211 Their performance nearly the same but mi 9T pro had half the price and even more than half, can't complain much for 855 +18 Reply
Эпωνо ኚиЦаጼαбрե մըчቺቪРсጿ и геታቻпсιдοղΣեδ рсιкωжокл
Ուզяጽа чΑցод екляτጼсно вաУскυтвеφο ցоտዎл ռυኦСлаз ኤа
Оπ ец иջΒ улοзθгаզ ощачውРዜ ላ ηЛозаጋощ եλа жዪμևቾθвυкт
Хիрс ξըρሬгεքЕ асаւофΣիпитասαվ իπግςуснуβ пумимишоԶιհаσոሤι ሸդιхυςеբ
qlMb.
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/55
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/271
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/205
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/158
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/52
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/100
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/6
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/151
  • xel6mrm319.pages.dev/149

    • chipset a12 bionic vs snapdragon 845